On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Greg Grossmeier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Whereas I think RelEng is probably[0] closer to only 20% in "new". > RelEng and Ops are the groups that to me are pretty obviously heavily weighted toward "keep the lights on" and "maintain in the face of external forces (e.g. upgrades)". Wherever the mw-core work went might also fall into that category, and there may be others. But I would hope that most if not all of the various teams within Reading, Editing, Discovery, and FR would have relatively low burdens in the "maintenance" areas, and therefore (mathematically) would have a stronger focus on "new development" (which for the purposes of this paragraph includes enhancing existing features). Am I wrong, and there are actually Reading, Editing, or Discovery groups which spend massive amounts of time on "maintenance"? Kevin
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
