12/21/22 11:58, Jason McIntyre пишет: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 07:40:01AM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:24:29PM +0000, Jason McIntyre wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:24:45PM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote: >>>> >>>> Feedback? OK? >>>> >>> >>> ok, in general i'm fine with this. i do have some concerns though: >> >> New diff with all points addressed, see inline for explanations. >> > > trimming this, but briefly: ok for your diff. i think this is fine. but > still one nit: > >> Index: usr.bin/csplit/csplit.1 >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/csplit/csplit.1,v >> retrieving revision 1.12 >> diff -u -p -r1.12 csplit.1 >> --- usr.bin/csplit/csplit.1 24 Oct 2015 15:32:50 -0000 1.12 >> +++ usr.bin/csplit/csplit.1 21 Dec 2022 06:56:23 -0000 >> @@ -37,14 +37,15 @@ >> .Op Fl ks >> .Op Fl f Ar prefix >> .Op Fl n Ar number >> -.Ar file args ... >> +.Ar file >> +.Ar arg ... >> .Sh DESCRIPTION >> The >> .Nm >> utility splits >> .Ar file >> -into pieces using the patterns >> -.Ar args . >> +into pieces using the pattern >> +.Ar arg . >> If >> .Ar file >> is >> @@ -92,7 +93,7 @@ created. >> .El >> .Pp >> The >> -.Ar args >> +.Ar arg >> operands may be a combination of the following patterns: >> .Bl -tag -width indent >> .It Xo > > so, is "arg" an operand or operands? well, it depends how you are > thinking of it. i would suggest we treat it as singular - it will read > better, and i don;t think anyone will read this text and complain that > it was misleading.
Right, I just went with the singular here, thanks. > > jmc >
