Really nice Keith. I love it. Jim
Sent from my iPad Cell 773.396.4638 Chicago 773.463.5494 Beaver Island 231.448.2109 Privacy Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message is private and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or inside information and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message On Sep 10, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Aaron Hackney <aa...@aaronhackney.com> wrote: > I upgraded last year to a fancy new body and I thought I would just > keep my old body as a backup, as it is very grainy at high ISO, and I > like to shoot indoors a lot with no flash, so it sat on my shelf for > the last year. > > Long story short, my old body has new life. I put my 70-200 on the old > body and crank the iso up to the max and shoot exclusively in B&W. > (Well, it's RAW, so the color data is still there but I use a RAW B&W > camera profile). > > The shots look like I'm shooting B&W film using Tri-X. LOVE IT! I use > the crap out of my old body now. I just leave my 70-200 on my old > camera and shoot with a shorter lens on my "good" body and carry them > both. I bought a Speed Strap that makes it easy to carry both at once > and they are very comfortable. > > Here is an example of what I am talking about: > http://www.aaronkeithstudios.com/blog/?p=183 > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Mike Oliveri > <mike.oliv...@student.rb60.com> wrote: >> I love my 50mm for indoors, but there are times I wish I could get wider. >> Sometimes at the karate dojo I'm just too close to the action for that >> prime. >> It's a wonderful portrait lens, though. The owner of my karate school really >> liked this shot I took of him: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_W._Walker >> I've taken some really great pictures of my wife and kids with it, too. >> Mike >> On Sep 10, 2010, at 12:40 AM, Jim Flanagan wrote: >> >> That's a nice overall lens Joe but not only is it big but those types of >> lenses are not very fast f3.5 means you'll have a hard time taking >> unobtusive portraits indoors. >> I prefer a Prime 50mm lens which is a perfect size for portraits and is >> F1.4. People also swear by a 35mm for inside as well but I really like the >> 50mm, it's also a tiny lens which doesn't make people nervous, >> >> For telephoto I have a 75-300mm f4.5-5.5 but I really want a bigger faster >> lens than that, I also have a nominal macro lense but want a good one and am >> experimenting w/ reverse mounting lenses for that as well as adapting old >> manual lens' >> >> sent from G1 >> Cell: 773.396.4638 >> Chicago: 773.463.5494 >> Beaver Island: 231.448.2109 >> >> On Sep 9, 2010 11:05 PM, "Joseph Lee" <joseph...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> Another new technology that will make you want to find a reason to upgrade >> the camera in the future. >> HDR Video..... >> http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/hdr-video-accomplished-using-dual-5d-mark-iis-is-exactly-what-i/ >> I could see this being a new feature in cameras in a few years. >> >> >> >> On Sep 9, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Dylan Haines wrote: >> >>> Yes I'll be adding to the lenses as time goe... >> >> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org | >> >> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org | >> >> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org | >> > > > > -- > "Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you > come alive and then go do that. Because what the world needs is people > who have come alive." -Dr. Howard Thurman > > ****************************** > Aaron Keith Hackney > aa...@aaronkeithstudios.com > Cell 210.325.2196 > ****************************** > | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org | | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
