sniff the port and see if the packets actually have a mac.  That will tell you 
if the problem is in the ipcop machine or a network problem.

>>> "Charlie Niehaus" <cnieh...@altamont.k12.il.us> 9/28/2010 1:54 PM >>>
We might be onto something.  I noticed a number of entries like:
Sep 28 13:09:52 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.1.41 (<no client hardware
address>) via eth0
Sep 28 13:09:54 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 10.0.1.41 via eth0
Sep 28 13:09:54 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.1.41 (<no client hardware
address>) via eth0
Sep 28 13:12:48 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 10.0.1.40 via eth0
Sep 28 13:12:48 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.1.40 (<no client hardware
address>) via eth0
Sep 28 13:12:50 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 10.0.1.40 via eth0
Sep 28 13:12:50 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.1.40 (<no client hardware
address>) via eth0
Sep 28 13:14:02 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 10.0.1.41 via eth0
Sep 28 13:14:02 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.1.41 (<no client hardware
address>) via eth0
Sep 28 13:14:04 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 10.0.1.41 via eth0
Sep 28 13:14:04 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.1.41 (<no client hardware
address>) via eth0
Sep 28 13:14:17 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 10.0.1.79 via eth0
Sep 28 13:14:17 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.1.79 (00:0c:f1:75:ba:d7) via
eth0
Sep 28 13:27:32 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 10.0.1.59 via eth0
Sep 28 13:27:32 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.1.59 (<no client hardware
address>) via eth0
Sep 28 13:27:34 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 10.0.1.59 via eth0
Sep 28 13:27:34 ipcop dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.1.59 (<no client hardware
address>) via eth0

So it looks like for some reason the DHCP is not able to get the MAC address
of the boxes requesting an IP?
SOME make it through.  This does seem to point to the DHCP server itself and
not a rogue on the network or something like that.

Ok - so . . new NIC?
What do we look for next.

-----Original Message-----
From: tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org
[mailto:tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Hackney
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 4:12 PM
To: Tech-Geeks Mailing List
Subject: Re: [tech-geeks] IPCop - DHCP not responding.

cat /var/log/messages | grep -i dhcpd

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Charlie Niehaus
<cnieh...@altamont.k12.il.us> wrote:
> I am restarting the server with
> Shutdown -r now
> When I make any changes.
> Is there a command line command I can issue to just restart the DHCP
server?
>
> Looking at the log files is a good idea.  What log file should I look at?
> (Remember - 4th grader here - where is it, and what is the name?)
>
> Thanks again for all the help so far.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org
> [mailto:tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Hackney
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 2:38 PM
> To: Tech-Geeks Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [tech-geeks] IPCop - DHCP not responding.
>
> Also, take a peek at the log files. If it's a problem with the
> daemon/permission issues/out of IP Addresses, then your answer will be
> there.
>
> Id's till be curious to see if the DHCP discovery messages are getting
> to the server and what the server is doing in response.....
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:53 PM, K Lesko <kle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Opps read your post over again and it looks like you addressed the range
>> issue.  Are you restarting the DHCP service after you make changes to the
>> config file?
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:26 PM, K Lesko <kle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you checked to see if any other processes may have crashed on the
>>> box?
>>> From terminal run:
>>>   ps aux|grep defunct
>>> to see any processes that may have crashed.
>>> If nothing shows up as defunct and your logs aren't showing errors I
> think
>>> Eric may have the right ideal about a bad NIC.
>>> I am definitely no expert but on your DHCP.CONF file you have:
>>> subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 #GREEN
>>> {
>>>        range 10.0.2.50 10.0.2.255;
>>>        option subnet-mask 255.255.0.0;
>>> Does this range declaration limit the dynamic IPs to those between the
>>> 10.0.2.50 and 10.0.2.255?  So are you sure you have any IPs left to hand
>>> out?
>>> Hopefully someone more qualified can chime in on this . . .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Abe Loveless
> <li...@lovelesscentral.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ??  You're not going to want a router managing dhcp are you?
>>>>
>>>> What do the system stats show you on the status pages, etc?  I've
always
>>>> heard that too large of a DHCP Range can really suck the memory out of
a
>>>> box.  Also, did you verify that you have plenty of disk space free?
That
>>>> should also be available on one of the status screens.
>>>>
>>>> Is your content filter also on this machine?  Any problems with that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/27/2010 12:47 PM, Charlie Niehaus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Abe.  Now just tell me why the boxes can not assign the IP?
>>>>>
>>>>> Might be a moot point - looking to replace it with a router.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org
>>>>> [mailto:tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org] On Behalf Of Abe Loveless
>>>>> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 11:51 AM
>>>>> To: Tech-Geeks Mailing List
>>>>> Subject: Re: [tech-geeks] IPCop - DHCP not responding.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/26/2010 11:59 PM, Charlie Niehaus wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The range of IP's is OK: I noticed that when I ran the Rogue DHCP
>>>>>> checker
>>>>>> program it ALWAYS picked up the HIGHEST IP in the range - even if I
>>>>>> change
>>>>>> the range and gave it MORE Ip's to hand out.
>>>>>
>>>>> It always does that.  IPCop starts handing out the at the top.  The
SME
>>>>> Server's used to start at the bottom.
>>>>> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
>>>>>
>>>>> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
>>>
>>
>>
>> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you
> come alive and then go do that. Because what the world needs is people
> who have come alive." -Dr. Howard Thurman
>
> ******************************
> Aaron Keith Hackney
> aa...@aaronkeithstudios.com
> Cell 210.325.2196
> ******************************
> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
>
> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
>



-- 
"Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you
come alive and then go do that. Because what the world needs is people
who have come alive." -Dr. Howard Thurman

******************************
Aaron Keith Hackney
aa...@aaronkeithstudios.com
Cell 210.325.2196
******************************
| Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |

| Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
| Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |

Reply via email to