Hi! all,
From: Iain Hibbert <plu...@rya-online.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:11:21 +0000 (GMT)
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Iain Hibbert wrote:
>
> > Ok - my question is, for a 5 byte ACL packet:
> >
> > 82 00 09 00 01 00 05 00 aa bb cc dd ee 00
> > ^^^^^ [........................]
> >
> > or
> >
> > 82 00 0a 00 01 00 05 00 aa bb cc dd ee 00
> > ^^^^^ [...........................]
> >
> > ?
> >
> > I think the second (but I did not design the NOKIA DTL-1 device :)
>
> further to this, on your input path
>
> + case BTUART_RECV_DTL_ACL_DATA: /* ACL Packet Complete */
> + if (dtlh->len & 0x0001)
> + m_adj(m, -1);
>
> this seems to be incorrect logic.. in the first case, it will chop a
> valid byte and in the second it will not chop the pad byte.
The com(4) port is sequentially transferred by one byte though NOKIA DTL
treats 2byte/word.
COM port
c...@pcmcia <-------------------------------- NOKIA DTL
0x82 rsvd lenL lenH ... dd ee 00
Thanks,
--
kiyohara
