David Holland <dholland-curr...@netbsd.org> wrote: > > How would this affect UFS side? For example, any potential code > > reduction and/or simplification? > > Yes. ufs_readwrite.c will become much less gross, for example. There > used to be assorted LFS-only code in the ufs sources; ad@ removed the > ifdefs some time ago but they could be resurrected and then used to > purge the relevant code. I don't know how much code that is. > > As for deeper simplifications, I don't know without digging around a > lot more than I have (particularly in the ext2fs code), but there > should be some.
Good, I think it would be great to look into this. > > This involves significant changes, therefore enough time should be left > > for mailing list readers (~1 week at least, before committing anything). > > It was discussed months ago. This is a reminder/heads-up. > Where? This mailing list is a right place where such discussions (and decisions) should happen. -- Mindaugas
