On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 02:02:51PM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote: > > Does anyone object to my going through and coming up with shorter names > (<= 8 chars) for these condvars?
It is worth chcking whether they are displayed with a "%.8s" format
(or similar) so that they don't need to be 0 terminated.
Otherwise the names must be strictly less than 8 bytes.
David
--
David Laight: [email protected]
