On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 03:38:42AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > > Heh, then why have we had it on i386 for years? > > > > Because of the X server. > > You are just saying: > "We introduced a significant security regression just for our own > convenience."
Perhaps... > I see no proper reason to avoid INSECURE for MODULAR if it's okay for X. ...and I'm not convinced of this, primarily because (from a practical point of view) X is unavoidable and unfixable, whereas modules are neither. This gets back to the underlying question of what purpose modules are supposed to serve, and as I know everyone knows what I think and is sick and tired of hearing about it, I'll pipe down. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org