On Oct 22, 2:25pm, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote: -- Subject: re: [patch] - add support for >2TB raid devices
| after talking some more with greg oster, i've gone with a suggestion | from him to not bump the version, since the new field will be zero | in all existing labels already, so it can be safely always included | for now. the only problem we envision is an old kernel seeing a new | large set and cutting it off. i can't think of data loss situations | for this, just access errors (which is what i've seen happen.) | | updated patches (i haven't merged any block/sector macros in yet): | | http://www.netbsd.org/~mrg/rf-2tb.diff | http://www.netbsd.org/~mrg/rf-2tb-netbsd-5.diff | Great! That works for me! christos
