On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:48:45AM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:32:34PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote: > > > > I don't like "it's MD, period" attitude. That solves nothing. > > We've had pmaps which have tried to pretend they were pmaps for some > other architecture (that is, that some parts of the pmap weren't > best left MD). For example, we used to have a lot of pmaps in our > tree that sort of treated the whole world like a 68K MMU. > > Performance has not been so great. And besides, what -are- you going > to do, in an MI way, about synchronization against hardware lookup?
Do you mean synchronization among processors?
