On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: > On 15.12.2010 19:43, Matt Thomas wrote: >> >> On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:53 AM, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: >> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Matt Thomas <m...@3am-software.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> The diffs are at http://www.netbsd.org/uvmexp-diff.txt >>> >>> Purely cosmetic comments: >>> - why are most of the cpu_nsoft count commented out? >> >> Because we were counting ASTs as soft interrupts but they aren't. >> kern_softint.c already counts soft interrupts. > > Alright, thanks for the explanation :) Are you going to add another > counter for ASTs or leave the commented code as-is?
Don't know. Should we count ASTs? Do we really care how many we get?
