On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:16:11PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote: > The following patch makes a vfork child update the parent's lwpctl area > while the child is running. Comments or better ideas?
I think this is a very good case of "don't do that". malloc after vfork() is just wrong. If rumphijack internally forces that for normal system calls, it should downgrade vfork() to fork(). Joerg
