On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:42:08AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
>
> > On Sat Feb 19 2011 at 23:21:35 +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > This branch is for the developement of a modernized disk quota system.
> > > The 2 main changes are: a new quotactl(2) interface and a new on-disk
> > > format, compatible with journaled ffs.
> >
> > Hmm, I'm wondering if the new quotactl syscall should have a new name
> > instead of keeping the old one.
> >
> > It doesn't make much sense to play __RENAME() games with it since
> > any old code will not compile against the new quotactl signature.
>
> that seems reasonable to me.
What do you propose then ? quotactl is the best name I can find for this
syscall ...
--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
