On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:45:45AM +0000, David Holland wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > > > That's a bug, or more accurately legacy behavior that doesn't need to > > > be supported. > > > > of course it's not nice. But we're talking about existing code calling the > > legacy quotactl. If we're going to change it to not check the fstab > > options any more, we may as well change it to use libquota. > > I don't understand - surely edquota and repquota go through your > proplib interface now?
We were talking about code like netatalk, which is why I propose a public library for this. -- Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org> NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference --