>> then, after replacing the failed sd0 with the new sd0 > But with scsictl detach/scan, I suppose?
If that's an excerpt from me: no. > I've done this several times with non-hotpluggable SCSI hardware > where I had to power off anyway. I've done it with non-hot-pluggable hardware _without_ powering off. If the SCSI bus is in use by any other devices, I will usually break to ddb (to ensure the bus is idle) during the unplug-and-replug. > But with SCA, I'm unsure, whether, after detaching sd0 (and sd1 still > there), a newly scanned sd will become sd0 or sd2? I'm not sure either. My guess would be that it would be sd2, but that is just a guess. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
