On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:27:41PM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote: > > returning to GNUC vs C99 semantics for inline functions, this is now > > partly handled with a __c99inline keyword but there are several files in > > the kernel containing functions marked inline that yet require external > > linkage as they are also called from other source modules.. this is > > provided by the opposite of __c99inline in both the GNUC and C99 cases, as > > per the patch below which adds an __extinline keyword for this usage > > Please don't add anything like this, but fix the corresponding users.
Ok I will look into that later, moving to static inline where possible iain
