On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:49:32 +0000 David Holland <dholland-t...@netbsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:37:33AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:00:18AM +0000, David Holland wrote: > > > > > > Other fses with their own rename implementations whose locking is > > > clearly wrong include tmpfs, msdosfs, udf, and nilfs. > > ^^^^^ this one seems urgent, no? > > As opposed to ffs? What's your point? > > -- > David A. Holland > dholl...@netbsd.org I think he meant that it's most likely to be used in a production environment. -- NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
