In article <CAEmhiu7cetkMHgK=F1fzt2R9KTb8q0csyEA=1-m+-vwejdn...@mail.gmail.com>, Cherry G. Mathew <[email protected]> wrote: >On 13 August 2011 11:26, Christos Zoulas <[email protected]> wrote: >> In article <[email protected]>, Cherry G. Mathew <[email protected]> wrote: >>>ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/cherry/tmp/wrap_ipi.diff >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I'd like to ask peoples' opinions about the above patch. This would >>>remove a couple of #ifdef XEN/#endif pairs I had to introduce >>>lately. >> >> If those are performance critical, perhaps they should be inlined? > > >I don't think they are - the first is a HALT ipi and the second >"kicks" other sleeping CPUS via cpu_needs_resched()
So the first one isn't, but how often is the second one called? christos
