Am 03.09.11 18:30, schrieb David Laight: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 05:04:16PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: >>> >>> I see. Does that mean it will push up ACPI com(4) ports up even when >>> com0 - com2 don't attach? >> >> Yes, but maybe >> com0 at acpi? >> com1 at acpi? >> com* at acpi? >> >> will workaround it. This needs to be tested. > > Look at the cvs history, if you do that the com ports tend to get > reversed. > There is no way of fixing the order of the com ports when acpi is used.
Now the big question is: What is more important? Having _no_ com ports, but in the right order, or having useable serial ports, but maybe with a strange numbering?
