On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:24:48AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote: > I realize that even though wapbl registers itself as a module, it is > not built as a loadable module - ie, it must be "built-in". I > intend to try to change this, so I would like to know if wapbl is > ever intended for non-ffs file systems.
The WAPBL option changes the buffer subsystem, that's why it can't easily be modularized. Joerg
