On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:13:03AM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: > > Just curious: clang comes with a static analyzer nowadays; wouldn't > > it be any better than the old lint, or is it missing features that > > can't make it a decent replacement for lint? > > The only real feature missing from lint is the "link" support, aka > inter-file consistency checking.
how do you mean? using "make lint" with NetBSD makefiles, if a function is prototyped differently in separate source files, lint will pick that up in the second pass.. iain
