On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote: > At 15:14 Uhr +0200 21.10.2011, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > >> This is bound to cause tremendous confusion. Can we please change the name > >> to "fs_quota_entry"? Consider what will happen when (or if) there is a > >> "zfs_quota_entry" or an "lfs_quota_entry": it will look to anyone reading > >> the code as if ufs_quota_entry is specific to the ufs layer and the > >> filesystems that use it. Not good. > > > >ufs_quota_entry is part of the API now, > > ... not in a formal release.
What he said. This is the opportunity to change it, even if it requires a short-term patch for one package in pkgsrc. Thor
