On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 07:42:18PM -0500, Mouse wrote:
> > The arguments that ufs_quota_entry (or whatever its name is) will be
> > good enough for any future filesystem is just not true.
>
> You have asserted that.
I also explained why, I think.
>
> Proof by repeated assertion is...unconvincing.
I can explain again, but I don't like writing the same thing over and
over again. I have more interesting things to do.
--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
