Hello! [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) writes:
>> Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:50:58PM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote: >>>> Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >>>> > [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: >>>> >> hi, >>>> >> >>>> >> what's the status of emap and pipe? >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > ... and encourage our users to use amd64 instead >>>> > of i386. >>>> >>>> I'm sorry to intervene, what about WINE? Unless we're going to have it >>>> functional on amd64, encouraging is useless. >>> >>> I don't understand your comment. Are you suggesting that a large fraction >>> of >>> NetBSD/i386 users use WINE and therefore would not be able to switch to the >>> amd64 port? >> >> I mean that those users who could switch most probably have switched already. >> And one of serious reasons to stay on i386 is functional WINE. > > as we now have non-stack-based pthread_self (thanks joerg), porting > the recent versions of wine should not be too hard. does it help wine > on amd64? Thanks for the information, I'll try to check (though I need to get current amd64 setup first). -- HE CE3OH...
