On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:43:57PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 03:26:07PM -0500, Mouse wrote: > > This either has a very simplistic idea of what child processes do > > between forking and execing/exiting, or it doesn't actually buy you > > much. > > Well, it only offers the common things like signal and file descriptor > manipulation. Of course it is not turing complete, and we are not talking > about removing vfork support either.
If it doesn't perform better -- do I misunderstand, or is that in fact the case -- why dirty up the system with this superfluous interface? I would have expected it to perform better... Thor
