Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote: > I am not sure I correctly understand what you mean: is it that we do not > have an equivalent of NetBSD's struct sema, and that it would need to be > implemented using mutex and condvar?
Looking at FreeBSD implementation, it seems almost trivial to import it in our kernel: we just have to s/struct mtx/kmutex_t/ Is it desirable to import it in the kernel, or should it stay in the DADHI driver? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org
