On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:07 PM, David Holland wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:28:48PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> [stuff] > > One thing jumps out at me: if it's a file-level flag, shouldn't it be > sufficient to use F_GETFL / F_SETFL to manipulate it, rather than > adding new fcntls?
That should be true. I also wonder whether we should also have a note that disabled SIGPIPE. similar to what paxctl does.
