On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Evgeniy Ivanov <lolkaanti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Izumi Tsutsui <tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: >> >>> Izumi, thank you for reviewing! New patches are attached. >> : >>> > I think it's better to use a positive LIBSA_ENABLE_LS_OP option rather >>> > than LIBSA_NO_LS_OP, and make whole (fs_ops)->ls op part optional because >>> > - there are many primary bootloaders (bootxx_foo) which don't need >>> > the ls op and have size restrictions (alpha, atari, pmax ...) >>> > - there are few bootloaders which support command prompt mode where >>> > the `ls' op is actually required (some ports don't have even getchar()) >>> >>> Done. >>> >>> > We also have to check all other non-x86 bootloaders which refer ufs_ls(). >>> > (ews4800mips, ia64, landisk, x68k, zaurus etc) >>> >>> Done. I'm not able to check though, but the modification is trivial >>> and almost the same as for i386. >> >> Committed all changes (with several fixes for ews4800mips and x68k) >> http://mail-index.NetBSD.org/source-changes/2011/12/25/msg029999.html > > Great! > >> Thank you for your great work! > > np :-) > >> Now it's time for someone[TM] to try PR/30866 :-) >> http://gnats.NetBSD.org/30866 > > Seems to be a useful feature, I'll work on this in Jan if it doesn't > violate [TM] :P
Unfortunately I was out of time and doubtfully will get some time for this soon... So anybody is welcome to work on this feature. -- Evgeniy
