On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:47:31 +0000 David Holland <[email protected]> wrote:
> But, how about "kern.module.supported" or "kern.module.canload" or > something? I like the kern.module.supported, or perhaps kern.module.enabled, as I have systems built without module loading support yet still have a few module sysctls around under that same hierarchy, and module.modular also seems ambiguous and redundant... -- Matt
