J. Hannken-Illjes <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is this an intended behavior? That consumes perfused and glusterfsd > > memory for no benefit. > Why is there no benefit of cached nodes?
A node that has not been used for hours can remain in the cache, consuming memory. This is my concern. > > Do I have a way to tell the kernel I would like a > > more aggressive recycling policy? > You could lower kern.maxvnodes then ... But that change is system-wide, not filesystem-specific. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz [email protected]
