YAMAMOTO Takashi <[email protected]> wrote:
> GETATTR needs another versions of op callbacks, yes. it doesn't seem
> like a big problem to me, tho.
Just to make sure I do not head in a wrong way. You suggest adding two
methods in puffs_ops?
int (*puffs_node_getattr_ttl)(struct puffs_usermount *,
puffs_cookie_t, struct vattr *,
const struct puffs_cred *,struct timespec *);
int (*puffs_node_setattr_ttl)(struct puffs_usermount *,
puffs_cookie_t, const struct vattr *, const struct,
puffs_cred *, struct timespec *);
PUFFS dispatcher would call puffs_node_getattr or puffs_node_getattr_ttl
depending on PUFFS_USE_FS_TTL(pu)
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
[email protected]
