On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 04:54:44AM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote: > In that case, I would suggest patching the kernel and let it return > ENODATA. The API was never usable, no risk of making a mess of it. It > would just need adjustements in documentation. > > bt code that uses ENOATTR stays unharmed, and the extended att. API > stays closer to the Linux one.
This has my vote as well. Martin
