On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:56:26PM +0200, Matthias Kretschmer wrote: > > > How about using fss for it instead. > > 1. fss is still marked experimental. > oh, I have overlooked that.
I'm not sure that should stop you though. Or the marking should be removed. People use it, it seems to work, it's been a while since anyone's reported problems that I've noticed. > > 2. does fss work with WAPL at all? > I don't know that. It's expected to at this point. (In -6 and -current, but IIRC not in -5.) -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org