On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:52:27PM +0200, Edgar Fu? wrote: > > Yes, but I have to question whether and why it would improve performance > > in this case. The stream of atime updates is still happening on the > > underlying filesystem, and that is still where you will be doing almost > > all of your reads from. > > My intent was to mount the snapshot ro,noatime and operate on that. > Am I again missing something stupid?
Hm. No, I don't think so. I wonder -- will the snapshot management code cause the resulting snapshot to be in a consistent state so access through the filesystem is safe? Thor
