In article <julcud$9sd$1...@serpens.de>, Michael van Elst <mlel...@serpens.de> wrote: > >Let wd1 disappear and the raid will try to use wd0a (dk0) and sd0a (dk1). >Of course raidframe will notice the mismatch in this case, but you can >easily imagine more complex scenarios where it doesn't. But a simple >failure case comes from trying to recover the failed wd1 without >rebooting. When you replace the drive it may attach as wd1 but then >as dk2. Now try to teach raidrame that its component changed the path.
That works too because the components are not signed. Actually this is the exact failure I got because wd0 was not found because of the latest ata changes! christos
