On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:12:36PM +0000, David Holland wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:49:09AM +0300, Alan Barrett wrote: > > If necessary, the open(2) syscall could be versioned so that > > O_RDONLY is no longer defined as zero. > > This seems possibly worth doing to avoid all the annoyance with > FREAD/FWRITE vs. O_RDONLY/O_WRONLY, but I really don't see how it's > connected to the rest...
oops, too early in the morning, disregard the last part. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
