Matt Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > > > Any reason why do you need bitfield based iteration, as opposed to list > > or array based? > > Be nice to have a MI method instead a hodgepodge of MD methods. > > The CPU_FOREACH method is ugly.
I totally agree. That is why couple years ago I wanted to add and convert everything to MI replacement of struct cpu_info. Since this work requires intervention to all ports, it did not materialise since.. After cleaning up the dust from ancient patches, I could put MI interface into a branch. However, I do not think that adding ad-hoc bitfield based interface in addition to the "ugly" one is an improvement. Quite the opposite as then we would need to deal with two "not great" ones. -- Mindaugas
