Am 24.02.2013 um 10:15 schrieb Mouse <[email protected]>: >> FWIW, _all_ of my NetBSD systems run PostgreSQL and thus require that >> stuff. > > And none of mine do - but all of mine require AF_TIMER sockets, which I > don't see NetBSD hurrying to adopt. > > I don't think any one person's use cases are a useful guide. I > actually don't think even "a large majority of users need it" or "a > large majority of systems need it" are justification for this; examples > of optional things which I think should remain optional despite being > very popular are options INET and pseudo-device pty.
But you know the meaning of 'FWIW', do you? ;)
