> I suspect that indeed, while a fluch cache command is running, the > disk is not considered busy. Only read and write commands are tracked. Would it a) make sense b) be possible to implement that flushes are counted as busy?
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Edgar Fuß
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Edgar Fuß
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Edgar Fuß
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Edgar Fuß
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Edgar Fuß
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Manuel Bouyer
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Edgar Fuß
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Manuel Bouyer
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Michael van Elst
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Manuel Bouyer
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Greg Troxel
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Edgar Fuß
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Edgar Fuß
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: high load, no bottleneck Edgar Fuß
