Thor Lancelot Simon <t...@panix.com> wrote: > Do you mean "all these requests *could* be honored on first flush"? If > so, then yes, I agree.
It could be done in a bold way by turning any VOP_FSYNC into a VFS_SYNC. Obviously it would be inappropriate in most situations, but when facing a huge amount of concurent VOP_FSYNC, perhaps it makes sense? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org
