On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 08:36:15PM -0300, Tomas Niño Kehoe wrote: > The next step, besides continuing / fixing the actual port is to start > working on the toolchain. Particularly an llvm backend for NetBSD/avr32 seems > the way to go.
For those of us not knowing the details: isn't avr32 supported by stock gcc? If not, why? If only in later versions, which? Creating a new llvm backend might be a good thing, but sounds way more complex than needed to get this port going. Maybe you should discuss options on tech-toolchain? Martin
