On Dec 15, 5:07pm, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote: -- Subject: re: Problem with autounload of nfsserver module
| right, that's my whole point. | | what's the real benefit to the end user for having these modules | use auto unload? mostly they seem to present bugs we have to fix | (which is good for fixing bugs, but annoying for users), instead | of actually being useful. i don't consider the minor memory | savings to be a real consideration here. | | i've long thought we should not auto unload by default. Think about it the other way around... If you don't auto-unload, most users will not run the unload code and the bugs will stay hidden. And you know too well, that I've been bitten by one unload bug that took me a month to figure out, since it manifested as random page faults in the pool code... christos