tls@ wrote: > > Note the caller of this hc128_init() is: > > > > I'm afraid "9KB stack on rekeying" is fatal on most ports. > > Well, the cipher should hardly ever get rekeyed. The rekeying > intervals could be considerably larger; I did not want to > increase them too much compared to the old implementation. > > We can kmem_alloc these structures instead.
If it's replaced kmem_alloc(9), it's okay for me. (on NetBSD/x68k there are so many kernel stack overflow on loads) > > I wonder if we should also consider "speed vs memory" > > especially for embedded users. > > It's 9K per CPU, total. Seems OK, no? I have no idea, but depend on pros and cons if it is not on stack? --- Izumi Tsutsui
