On Mon, 5 May 2014 15:43:56 +1200 Mark Davies <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 May 2014, Christos Zoulas wrote: > > I wrote: > > >So can someone suggest where exactly the patch should go. And > > >isn't proc_lock held at this point (entered at line 344, exit at > > >line 569)? > > > > How about this? > > Seems good to me and can confirm that its fixed the increasing proc > count problem. Can someone commit and pull up to 6? I also see emulation-code specific exit hooks support, I've not checked if it's really possible, but could that linux-specific case be solved there instead of in the generic code if so? Thanks, -- Matt
