On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:45:22 -0700 [email protected] (Brian Buhrow) wrote:
> provide further results. I assume a fix would want to be pulled > up,assuming I find it, on the grounds that it's a security fix. I'll also > see about trying -current and NetBSD-6, but I'm guessing those are > vulnerable as well, given Matthew's test with my binary under NetBSD-6 > yesterday. Was a PR for this ever filed, or the problem fixed since? Any relation to SA2013-013? Thanks, -- Matt
