On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:32:34PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > Hi all, > please review the attached patch to remove the two remaining MI uses of > random(9). Neither should be in a performance critical code path and > both may actually benefit from the better distribution. The vfs_bio.c > change is a bit more involved as I am trying to replace a 32bit division > with a long multiplication, which should be cheaper pretty much > anywhere.
When doing that sort of thing, please expand the explanatory comments, not shrink them... -- David A. Holland [email protected]
