> I had not checked the licence when I wrote the original email, it is > GPL v2 and I agree that we wouldn't want it in tree. > > Both bits were written by the same person (at TI), maybe ask if they > would dual licence it. > > The drm code is licenced under mixture of BSD and GPL. The core stuff > and mass market GPU drivers are BSD, more recent SoC drivers look to > be mostly GPL. > > We might want a plan for how to do framebuffers and X11 across all the > SoCs. Do we stick to using wsfb and xf86-video-wsfb or recommend that > new ports use drmkms and either xf86-video-modeswitching or a more > specific X11 driver ? > > Maybe take this to tech-x11 ?
we should take this to the authors of this code and ask them for the same dual-license the rest of the drm code has. anyone want to carry the torch? :) .mrg.
