On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:49:31 +0900 Kengo NAKAHARA <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 2015/04/16 11:49, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote: > > On 2015/04/09 19:44, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote: > >> I implement x86 MD MSI/MSI-X support code. Here is the patch: > >> http://www.netbsd.org/~knakahara/md-msi-msix/x86-md-msi-msix.patch > >> > >> Furthermore, here is the usage example of if_wm: > >> http://www.netbsd.org/~knakahara/md-msi-msix/if_wm-msi-msix.patch > > > > I fix pointed issues. Here is new patches: > > http://www.netbsd.org/~knakahara/md-msi-msix-2/x86-md-msi-msix-2.patch > > http://www.netbsd.org/~knakahara/md-msi-msix-2/if_wm-msi-msix-2.patch > > > > If there is no objection, I commit x86-md-msi-msix-2.patch after one > > or two weeks. > > I fix some bugs and commit. > > If you like, could you test MSI/MSI-X device drivers code with > "#ifdef __HAVE_PCI_MSI_MSIX"? Hello! How can I test this in context of kern/49663 (iwm(4) device that only works when MSI is enabled)? If someone can make an updated patch for iwm I can test it on hardware that has the problem. Thanks, -Tobias
