> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > > A FreeBSD developer studying our examples told me that we traditionally use > > u_int in place of unsigned [int] - calling the usage of 'unsigned' a > > linuxism. > > I have no opinions on it. How is it? > > Personally, I consider the use of u_int a historic mistake, but it is > wildly used. Why the use of plain standard C is a Linuxism is beyond me.
i've been using "unsigned" as is for a while now, when i need it. i had never ever considrered it could be a linuxism. .mrg.
