On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Paul Goyette <[email protected]> wrote: > My crusade for modularity has arrived at the pcppi(4) driver, and I've > discovered that there are a number of places in the code where a #if is used > to determine whether or not some _other_ driver is available to provide > certain routines. For pcppi(4), these dependencies are for the attimer(4) > and pckbd(4) drivers. (While I haven't yet gone searching, I'd be willing > to wager that there are other similar examples in other drivers.)
How about: - making pcppi(4) provide the new pcppibus(4), and - making attimer(4) and pckbd(4) attach at pcppibus(4) ?
